I read a discussion on an internet message board about the (theoretical?) risk of contracting HPV/HSV, should one receive "hand relief" at the end of a sensual massage.
Another contributor suggested he ask the masseuse to use her feet instead of her hand.
Although I appreciate that the remark may have been somewhat "tongueTongue in cheek"; "Googling" the relevant terminology would suggest the use of feet/breasts to provide physical stimulation is not that unusual. I was interested in the logic behind or against this concept as a safer sexual activity.
The prevalence of other types of warts, eg. verrucas, and fungal infections, on feet generally, and the lesser vigilance, regarding STD's, where feet are concerned, leads me to question whether a "foot job" would really be safer, or more risky than a "hand job", (assuming the feet belonged to someone who also engaged in it with others).
I understand some enjoy the use of stockinged feet in this activity. I'd imagine this would reduce skin contact/friction sufficiently to avoid transmission of the viruses concerned?
Is HPV/HSV transmission possible from breasts to genitals?
"Foot jobs", etc safer than HJ's?
Linear Mode
